Even after living in the Bible Belt for over a decade I am always surprised about the misconceptions of non-Catholics of Catholic beliefs. Granted there is about 500 years of rumors developing and confusion becomes a blaze that spreads quickly on dry grass.
Growing up I always knew that I would go to college and major in Theology, even though I never really knew what I would do with that degree. I wanted to know everything about my faith and was tired of my religion class teachers giving me wishy-washy answers that did not clarify anything. I grew up with a strong example of the faith from my parents, who made sure we learned our Hail Marys and Our Fathers like all good Catholic boys and girls. At some point I became interested in the meaning behind the traditions and rituals that had developed in the Church and from that, my fascination with relics. All the tradition we have in the Church there is a meaning behind it, ranging from the types of vestments the priest wears during the Mass (and outside the Mass as well) to the simple act of crossing ourselves before prayer. As I entered my young adult life I had studied beyond what was required for class to feed the hunger I had to know more about my faith. My parents even started asking me questions of something or other concerning the faith (even a few upperclassmen too).
I could not see myself studying anything else. But now I have a degree in Theology - what to do? Why, teach it of course! The RCIA (Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults) program at my church was a good way to get my feelers out to see if I would make a half-way decent teacher. And thus a journey of discovery began.
Remember I'm in the Bible Belt, so a lot of out inquirers are from very Protestant backgrounds, many of which still hold the Catholic Church in contempt. There are things that I always thought simple and basic to understand that many of the Inquirers have a hard time wrapping their heads around it. Many of them do not understand at first that being Catholic is a lifestyle and joining the Catholic Church is not like moving to a new house up the street. Oh no, it's more along the lines of becoming a citizen of a different country whose culture is similar but different in so many ways. It's out of the comfort zone of many people and it scares them, sometimes it can be too much.
For those who the change is too much for, they sometimes lash out at us who teach them. This reaction, however, is not limited to people in the RCIA program. I am in no means saying that this is a one way street. Catholics also have some misconjectures when is comes to their Protestant brethren.
The goal in life is to find the truth, no matter what our situation in life is we have to find it. For as they say Christ is the Way, the Life and the Truth.
Friday, December 16, 2011
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Ode to Bob
(A Freestyle Poem)
Bob was a very dear friend,
He gave me joy when no one else could.
Listening to me spill out my woes
Without judgement or scorn, what a dear.
He said nothing as I took the knife to his head,
And cracked his neck, he understood.
His guts spilled on the floor,
But there was little blood
He was always so considerate that way.
I shall always remember Bob
Especially as I puree his remains, which stain my hands,
And add the puree to soups and breads - how delicious!
So rest in peace my dead Bob, you make such delightful bread.
I hope others will enjoy you as much as I,
For you are now homemade and really yummy.
Bob was a very dear friend,
He gave me joy when no one else could.
Listening to me spill out my woes
Without judgement or scorn, what a dear.
He said nothing as I took the knife to his head,
And cracked his neck, he understood.
His guts spilled on the floor,
But there was little blood
He was always so considerate that way.
I shall always remember Bob
Especially as I puree his remains, which stain my hands,
And add the puree to soups and breads - how delicious!
So rest in peace my dead Bob, you make such delightful bread.
I hope others will enjoy you as much as I,
For you are now homemade and really yummy.
R.I.P. Robert 'Bob' Pumpkin
Monday, December 05, 2011
A Morbid Connection to Heaven:
An Investigation of Relics & The Modern Need for Them
Chapter One: History (Part Two)
There were several reasons used to justify the stealing
of relics. First was the basic need of relics for new churches and
religious organizations that were being established; the churches had
to possess a relic before they could be properly consecrated. When
there was a strong devotion to a particular saint, the physical
remains of that saint tended to appear to act as a focal point for
the devotion. Relics were also used as a form of spiritual
protection against the injustice of secular authority. This, in
turn, lead to competition amongst the religious communities of whom
had who of the holy dead, spurring translations. Relics were also a
source of income for monasteries from the donations that pilgrims
would give in hope of intercessions from the saint. So in a sense
relics of a saint became a form of a fund raiser for a community and
even collectible items, and owning them became a symbol of prestige
for cities, kingdoms, and monarchs.
It is hard to
overstate the importance of the cult of the relics during the Middle
Ages. They were used in the dedication of churches where they were
integrated into the altar; they were used in law courts for swearing
oaths; relics were found on the battlefield as suggested by the
description of Roland's sword in the Song of Roland. In short,
relics were an integral part of daily life and were accepted
unquestioningly. The
cult of the relics played a critical role in the missionary
activities. The missionaries who converted northern Europe were
dealing with people whose religion was fundamentally animistic. To
them, it seemed that the entire world was inhabited and controlled by
unseen powers; every tree had its own spirit, every pool its devil,
every mountain its god. There was no distinction between the laws of
nature and the laws of God. In accepting Christianity, pagans
believed Christ's powers to be more potent than those of their former
gods. The converts expected the new God to intervene as often and as
powerfully in nature as the old, and if He failed to do so, they
would frequently revert to their old beliefs. Gregory the Great
recommended to Augustine of Canterbury that the cult of the saints
and martyrs be presented to the English as the rival to pagan
animism.
As the Medieval Age wore on, “relics came to be
displayed more prominently in the churches”
more so than before; even the reliquaries and altar tombs became more
ornate to draw attention to the strange treasure. This brought a
greater demand unto the relic market; so when the Crusades allowed
access to the Holy Land for Western Europe and the saints that rested
there, it was a welcome conflict. When Constantinople was sacked in
1204, a great number of relics were found and sent back, including
those of Saint Catherine of Alexandria. But for some reason, when
the relics were sent back, they were not sent in their original
reliquaries. Since the relics were not in their reliquaries, there
was only the word of the relic-monger that the bones were those of a
saint. With the lack of identification, the relic market was flooded
by false relics, and it became hard to distinguish between the true
saint relic and bones of an animal. The Council of Lyon forbade
anyone to venerate any relic new on the scene without proper
approbation by the Pope.
But once the relic was discovered, authenticated and enshrined in a
church, pilgrims came flocking. Setting out on a pilgrimage to visit
shrines that housed a relic became a way to be blessed and forgiven
of sins. Often pilgrimages were prescribed by confessors as a form
of penance.
The veneration of relics had a strong following until
the sixteenth century, when the Protestant Reformation occurred. The
Protestants had a rather violent reaction against the cult of relics
and the saints to whom they belong, particularly the idea of saintly
intercession. Martin Luther opposed the use of relics since many had
no apparent proof of historic authenticity or any biblical support;
it also “constitute[d] a reliance on works rather than on faith.”
Luther saw the cult of relics as an invention of the Roman Church.
John Calvin rejected relics based on theology; and his followers,
particularly in Northern Europe, destroyed many reliquaries, melting
them and taking the precious gems that adorned them. Calvin himself,
though, confined his attacks to relics that appeared to be
improbable, such as the multiple heads of Saint John the Baptist and
even claimed that if one took all the pieces of the True Cross and
put them together it would make a large ship. The Huguenots in
France were probably the most violent when destroying reliquaries.
Some of the French churches still bear the marks of their attacks.
In England, many relics were destroyed, especially the relics of
Saint Thomas à Becket,
which were taken from their reliquary, burned, and the ashes spread
to the winds, though some say that Becket's bones were hidden
elsewhere in the Cathedral.
The Council of Trent convened in 1545 in response to the
criticisms of the Protestants. The Council, in its twenty-fifth
session, stressed that, despite the lack of Biblical support, the
veneration of relics was a legitimate devotion basing on the
Apostolic tradition and the constant practices of the Church. There
was also an affirmation of what earlier councils (such as Council of
Lyon) and synods had said, especially the condemnation of anyone who
denied the cult of relics as false or unholy. It also stressed the
need for the cult of relics to be under the direct supervision of the
Holy See and not the local bishops. Much of what Trent did to
reorganize the veneration of relics still holds true today.
After Trent, however, the devotion to relics never
returned to the level of fervor it had before the Protestant
Reformation. Not much attention was given to them until the
theologian F. Suarez collected the teachings concerning relics and
commented upon them. He built his argument on top of Saint
Augustine's saying that “the relation between the saint and his
relics is not to be sought in physical continuity … but in the
reason on which the moral dignity of the relics is based.”
Around the age of so-called Enlightenment, theologians had differing
views of the cult of relics. Some viewed the cult of relics on a
different, even a lower, level then that of the cult of saints, but
others viewed the cult on the same level. Saint Robert Bellarmine, in
his De Ecclesia trimphanti distinguished the respect and honor
given to relics here on Earth and the honor given to the saints in
Heaven. Cardinal Billuart explains that relics as materiel objects
have absolutely no right to be venerated, and that this right comes
in the formal aspect in which they are worthy of the same veneration
as the saint.
The cult of relics has never been a foreign idea in the
Catholic Church; it has been there since the beginning and is by no
means an invention of the Medieval Church. It has been an integral
part the the Church's development and has aided in the strengthening
of the resolve of the faithful. This
veneration of the holy dead still plays a role today in the Church
and should not be discontinued.
End of Part Two.
End of Chapter One.
To Be Continued............
(Copyright: Belongs to the Wanderer)
(If interested in research please contact me.)
To Be Continued............
(Copyright: Belongs to the Wanderer)
(If interested in research please contact me.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)